Autonomy vs. Paternalism in Psychiatric Nursing

In as much as psychiatric nursing is an intricate field, one of the most significant questions that always arise is the extent to which patients should be allowed to make decisions for themselves and how much authority the health care provider should take over their choices ‘for their good’. Decisional autonomy is the ability of patients to make decisions over their treatment, while paternalism entails the health care practitioners assuming the rights of patients in decision-making for reasons of the patient’s good. This tension is most evident in a psychiatric context, as patients’ decision-making capacity may be affected by their psychosis. It is therefore important to understand and manage this tension that appropriately exists within psychiatric nursing to deliver proper care while at the same time protecting patients from their irrationality. In this article, the author plans to review the paradigm of the degree of freedom and the degree of control in the process of nursing, based on the findings of the recent studies and the relevant theory.

A Concept Analysis on the Autonomy of Nurses Attending to Patients with Psychiatric Disorders

Patient self-determination is one of the most critical ethical values in health care since a patient’s right to decisional control of his/her treatment is unconditional. In psychiatric nursing, autonomy refers to the patient’s ability to make a reasoned decision as to the management of care or alteration in their daily living. It is critical to use this approach in the management of patients because it strengthens their perceived control over their care and treatment. A sample study of the attempts to increase clients’ self-direction in the process of future long-term mental health clients shows that professionals employ different strategies to increase autonomy, including the dismantling of restraints, training themselves and others in the client’s preferences, and deinstitutionalization of the relationship of the caregivers and the cared.

Understanding the Psychiatric Care Concerning Paternalism

Hence, the tenet of paternalism, while seen in a negative light as a result of controlling and dominating implications, can be at times useful in psychiatric nursing. It entails decisions about patients in conditions in which they cannot make proper decisions for themselves. The concept of protective empowerment in psychiatric-mental health nursing exemplifies how the nurse is obliged to abide by the principle of beneficence and this principle not to inflict any harm, and at the same time is also obligated to respect the patient’s autonomy. This theory is in line with the patient protection policy while enhancing the patient’s involvement in the medical decision-making process.

Yearwise Publication Trend on psychiatric nursing

Find publication trends on relevant topics

Balancing Autonomy and Paternalism

Relations between these two concepts are intricate and thus must be critically analyzed and approached from an ethical perspective. While the patient has the right to self-determination, the nurses need to evaluate the patient’s capacity to make decisions at every given time and balance this with the possible danger of exercising full autonomy. In situations where the patient’s decision is likely to harm the patient, then it is reasonable to engage in paternalistic intervention. For example, in the case of treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care, there is a described hierarchy of treatment pressures moving from persuasion to compulsory treatment, each step of which has different degrees of rationale.

Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas

Although now and then not significant, ethical issues are recurrent in psychiatric nursing practice, mostly due to discordance of the patient’s or guardian’s preference with what is regarded as therapeutically beneficial. These examples of informed consent and ECT include the ethical challenges regarding the rights and welfare of patients, which are best solved with both patients’ agreement and strong-stemmed decisions for the patient’s best interest. Furthermore, the study on perceptions of ethical coercion among nurses shows that the current and former nurses differ in the acceptable standards of use of physical coercion and ethics in implementing coercion in the acute psychiatric unit.

Practical Approaches to Navigating Autonomy and Paternalism

Practical strategies for navigating the balance between autonomy and paternalism include fostering open communication, involving patients in care planning, and employing a patient-centered approach. The concept of relational autonomy, which considers the interdependence of patients and their caregivers, offers a valuable framework for understanding and respecting patient autonomy within the context of their relationships and support systems. This approach acknowledges that patients’ decisions are often influenced by their social and relational contexts, and it seeks to empower them within these frameworks.

Case Studies and Real-World Applications

Real-world applications of these principles can be seen in case studies that reflect the ethical dilemmas faced by psychiatric nurses. For example, trauma-informed care in an inpatient pediatric psychiatric unit revealed ethical challenges as nurses sought alternatives to coercive interventions like chemical and physical restraints. These cases underscore the importance of ethical decision-making frameworks and the need for continuous reflection on practice.

Recent Publications on psychiatric nursing

Find publications on relevant topics

Conclusion

The balance between autonomy and paternalism in psychiatric nursing is a dynamic and ongoing challenge. It requires a deep understanding of ethical principles, a commitment to patient-centered care, and the ability to navigate complex clinical situations with sensitivity and compassion. By fostering autonomy while judiciously employing paternalistic interventions when necessary, psychiatric nurses can provide ethical and effective care that respects the dignity and rights of their patients.

References

  1. Broer T, Nieboer AP, Bal RA. Quest for client autonomy in improving long-term mental health care. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Dec;19(6):385-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00699.x. PMID: 21054724.
  2. Chiovitti RF. Theory of protective empowering for balancing patient safety and choices. Nurs Ethics. 2011 Jan;18(1):88-101. doi: 10.1177/0969733010386169. PMID: 21285200.
  3. Szmukler, G., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2008). Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health17(3), 233–244.
  4. Schmidt Kashka, M. and Keyser, P.K. (1995), Ethical Issues in Informed Consent and ECT. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 31: 15-21.
  5. Lind M, Kaltiala-Heino R, Suominen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Välimäki M. Nurses’ ethical perceptions about coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Aug;11(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00715.x. PMID: 15255910.
  6. Rose DN. Respect for patient autonomy in forensic psychiatric nursing. J Forensic Nurs. 2005 Spring;1(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2005.tb00007.x. PMID: 17073051.
  7. Regan K. Trauma informed care on an inpatient pediatric psychiatric unit and the emergence of ethical dilemmas as nurses evolved their practice. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Mar;31(3):216-22. doi: 10.3109/01612840903315841. PMID: 20144033.

Top Experts on “psychiatric nursing